It's Wordy Wednesday...
...but today I'll talk about more words you want to get rid of before submitting (a follow up to my post 2 weeks ago, which you can view here). Today's focus: unnecessary words.
Here's the checklist, followed by examples:
Just
Really
Very
Somewhat
Somehow
Seemed
In a way
Actually
Rather
Quite
Then
That
Thing
All
Quick
Step
Hard
Little
Long
Still
Enter these words (and their variations) in your "find" box for your word processor. If you don't find each one dozens (and sometimes hundreds) of times, then congratulations, you have a tight manuscript. If not, here's some examples to get your started:
1) It's all like just somehow really very wordy
Now, you probably don't have sentences that wordy, but they might look something like this:
Somehow, he knew this would happen.
vs.
He knew this would happen
It all made sense. If only he could just make sense of that last clue...
vs.
It all made sense. Now, if he could decipher the last clue...
She really hated him, and it spread to all her friends like it was some kind of pandemic.
vs.
Her hatred for him was pandemic. After a week of gossip, everyone in the office wanted him out.
(Notice that cutting unnecessary words doesn't always make your sentence shorter.)
2) It seems quite hard to read, or rather, its actually somewhat tedious
Now that's a tedious sentence. Yours might look a little more like these:
She seemed to notice him.
vs.
She noticed him.
It was rather hard not to think of him that way.
vs.
She couldn't think of him that way.
The dog looked somewhat angry.
vs.
The dog growled.
3) In a way, this thing is still a little long
Ugh! Here are some examples:
In a way, her answer reflected wisdom beyond her years.
vs.
Her answer showed wisdom beyond her years.
The box was lined with black things, long little tubes that poked up in all directions.
vs.
Finger-length, black tubes lined the box, poking up like porcupine quills.
It was taking them a long time to get where they needed to go. Bryan looked at his watch.
vs.
Bryan checked his watch. 5:00. "We should have been finished by 4:30!"
4) It's not just about cutting words
Notice these examples are not mindless word-cutting exercises. Sometimes there is a place to use "just" and "that". Your goal isn't just to cut words, but to replace them with ones that show the reader your story.
Now take the challenge further. Read your manuscript and look for words you use a lot. Put them in your "find" box and see how you've used them. Can you cut them out and make your writing sharper?
Graeme Brown
Junior editor
http://www.graemebrownart.com/the_pact.html
Twitter: @GraemeBrownWpg
Show the story using dynamic words is something I repeat a lot to folks. Thanks for taking the time to spell it out, Graeme. :)
ReplyDeleteHi Laurie,
ReplyDeleteIt's a subtle touch that makes all the difference. Thanks for adding your comment!
:)
Graeme,
ReplyDeleteI assume that the characters' vernacular in dialogue can still be tweaked at times to show his or her lack of command of the English language or unique regional slang while using these suggestions in the narrative, correct?
Gary Eddings
Hi Gary,
DeleteGreat point!
Indeed dialogue can be tweaked, though sometimes you can do things in dialogue that wouldn't work in narrative, depending on the character. I usually say dialogue out loud and ask if it's the way someone would talk. Even then, if it sounds right, I then ask if it would annoy me to listen to them talk that way, in which case I might consider presenting them differently. Keep in mind that, although you are representing real-life talking with dialogue, you also have readers who have to slog through it for hundreds of pages, so as a writer you want to be considerate of your reader and tweak accordingly.
Helpful post, Graeme. I especially appreciate your excellent examples, because we all know that showing is better than telling.
ReplyDeleteMy only quibble is with the porcupine. Quills point neatly toward the tail unless someone is stupid enough to annoy the animal. Then they bristle outward in a tidy radial shield, not all higgly-piggly as implied in "poked up in all directions." I admire porkies.
Hi Nikki,
DeleteThat's a good point, showing a different aspect of editing: research. I suppose the simplest fix would be to just cut "in all directions" then let the reader's imagination kick in, although if I was adamant about wanting to present a higgly-piggly image I'd have to pick another comparison.
Maybe:
Finger-length, black tubes lined the box, poking up like needles on a pin-cushion.
Good fix, Graeme. Does anyone besides me still have a pin-cushion?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete